In re: Prime Minister Netanyahu’s handling of the Iran crisis:
1) Netanyahu shouldn’t have waved around that cartoonish drawing on the podium of the United Nations. It made him look unserious, and a man in his position can’t afford to look unserious. …
2) Netanyahu needlessly alienated President Obama by entering, inadvertently or not, American partisan politics. …
3) Netanyahu’s constant threats, and warnings, about Iran’s nuclear program have undermined Israel’s deterrent capability. …
Let’s not forget that the main reason the threat posed by Iran’s nuclear ambitions to world peace (and to American national security, as President Obama has stated) is at the top of the international agenda is Benjamin Netanyahu. He has made this issue an urgent one. He has helped focus President Obama’s attention on the issue, and he has helped focus Europe’s attention as well. Without Netanyahu’s constant prodding, I doubt that sanctions would be as strong as they are.
And so now we’re getting the same thing again, with variations—yeah, Bibi may act like an ass sometimes, get carried away and all, but the important thing is he’s got everyone focused on Iran, taking Iran seriously, doing his bidding.
Which, sadly, is largely true. Virtually the entire foreign policy apparatus of the United States has bought into the entirely false premise that Iran is serious threat to world stability and world peace. We went through exactly the same routine with Iraq—the endless sanctions, which do nothing but cause hardship and resentment among the people we are supposedly helping, the endless “deadlines,” and, soon, the endless agitation for “regime change,” which will, of course, give us everything we want without bloodshed, or at least not a lot of bloodshed. No one in the State Department, or the Defense Department, or the CIA wants a war with Iran, but no one has the nerve to call a halt to the endless shoving and bullying that have no purpose but to back Iran into a corner, which would have the inevitable result of backing us into a corner as well. We have to attack! Our credibility is at stake!
Both Netanyahu and his Iranian counterpart, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, feed on crisis and chest-thumping as an alternative to actually governing. The Republican Party has a similar appetite for irresponsibility as a way of life, and the Democratic Party’s basis for foreign policy when it comes to the Middle East is to be 97 percent as stupid as the Republican Party. Anyone see a happy ending for this one? Don’t hold your breath.
Afterwords
If there is a star of hope anywhere in all of this, it is in the fact that the American voting public simply does not want to hear about foreign affairs in this election. Mitt Romney is dishing out nothing more than “muffled platitudes” and “boring pabulum,” according to an exasperated Jennifer Rubin, suggesting that his advisors believe that that is exactly what Americans want to hear. Yet the GOP is wedded, or rather welded, to a gigantic and ever expanding defense budget, not to mention an hysterical worship of all things military. The Tea Party crowd, which is, after all, the ground troops of the GOP, are thoroughly xenophobic and compulsively confrontational. Yet, when it comes to actual fightin’, they don’t seem all that interested. The GOP may not be willing to confront its repeated and massive foreign policy disasters, but, for the time being at least, they don’t seem to be in too much of a hurry to repeat them.