And on top of all these [Republican intransigence and Democratic flabbiness] , everybody below the top 5% of the American income distribution today is not living any better than their predecessors did a generation ago. We all [“have,” I guess] cheap electronic toys, but offsetting that we have more congestion, longer commutes, and more expensive houses. For the top 5% things are better. For the rest of us, it looks as though they are not.
There seems to be a Puritanical aversion to admitting that material objects can make our lives “better” in any meaningful way. Everyone acknowledges that the printing press was an epochal invention because it made the great learning of the ages available to everyone. Why not admit that modern electronics do the same thing with great music, great operas, great plays, great movies, and even great television? Not to mention that, in a few years, you’ll be able to carry a library around in your pocket. As I’ve complained before, liberals like Brad and Paul Krugman insist that money, rather than possessions, are the measure of wealth. But, unless we’re misers, we want money because we can buy things. It’s the things, not the cash, that gratify our desires, and the things, to Brad’s confusion, keep getting better.
And then there’s the supposed downside to living in 2012 instead of 1992: “more congestion, longer commutes, and more expensive houses.” As for “more congestion,” that simply means more people, which doesn’t strike me as much of a problem. “Longer commutes”? After five minutes of “research” on the Internet, I found that twenty years ago the average commute was 22 minutes. Now it’s up to 25. Not really horrendous, particularly since you can do a hell of a lot more in your car than you could twenty years ago, thanks to all our cheap electronic toys. As for “more expensive houses,” they’re more expensive largely because they’re larger, more luxurious, and, if you’re lucky, located in an area that’s increasingly desirable to live in.
So it comes down to this: life is pretty much hell these days because of those extra three minutes in traffic (of course, if you’re riding on Brad’s beloved public transportation, your commute is twice as long. Ouch!)
Oh, and one more thing: “For the top 5% things are better. For the rest of us, it looks as though they are not.” Well, if you make over $100,000, you’re in the top 5% for individual income. If you have a household income of around $175,000, you’re in the top 5% for that category. Brad’s a professor at Berkeley, he’s coauthor of a textbook, and his wife Ann Marie is a research fellow at Pacific McGeorge’s Capital Center for Government Law and Policy. Is he in both 5% categories? I think he is.
Afterwords
It would also be nice if Brad would say one word about what strikes me as easily the worst thing about life in these United States: our bloodthirsty “War on Terror,” which is little more now than a desperate search for someone—anyone, really—whom we can kill, regardless of how flimsy the justification. We don’t even have to know who they are! They just have to look funny, and blam!